Quantcast
Channel: Cabinet Office - Activity on GOV.UK
Viewing all 8439 articles
Browse latest View live

Guidance: Delivering Differently: Q&A

$
0
0

Updated: Added information about the deadline for sending in an Expression of Interest.

This guide contains answers to frequently asked questions about the Delivering Differently Challenge.

This programme will provide 10 authorities with up to £100,000 of support to spearhead transformative projects.

This includes bespoke professional support so that they can undertake a strategic review of all available options, guidance from an expert panel and opportunities to network and share their experiences with other Challenge authorities.


Collection: Departmental Improvement Plans

$
0
0

Updated: Added Departmental Improvement Plan for Home Office.

Departmental Improvement Plans set out what departments will do to ensure the long term health and success of the department. They are designed to be a useful tool to help departments focus on priorities for improvement.

The model is based on ensuring that plans are:

  • owned by departmental boards
  • tailored to meet departmental needs but with core elements
  • linked to departmental operational/business plans
  • annually assessed

Departmental Improvement Plans replaced Capability Reviews which were first developed in 2005 and refreshed in 2009. A pilot exercise was conducted from October 2012 to June 2013 and resulted in the publication of Departmental Improvement Plans for: Department for Communities and Local Government, Department for International Development, Foreign and Commonwealth Office and HM Revenue and Customs.

Since summer 2013, the new model of Departmental Improvement Plans has been rolled out across government. All government departments are expected to publish their Improvement Plans by April 2014 and these will be made available below, along with the plans from departments that participated in the pilot exercise.

Transparency data: Cabinet Office absence data

$
0
0

Updated: Added data for September 2013

Reports providing brief commentary on the Cabinet Office sick absence results.

Transparency data: Payroll costs and non-consolidated pay data, 2013 to 2014

$
0
0

Updated: Added Nov and Dec 2013 data.

Monthly management information on staff numbers and paybill costs in Cabinet Office and non-consolidated performance related pay data for Cabinet Office.

Notes to accompany the release of monthly workforce management information:

  1. These figures are not official statistics. They are internal workforce management information published in the interests of transparency.

  2. These figures have not been reconciled centrally with any national statistics. Where differences appear between the monthly information and national statistics, clarifying comments are provided.

  3. The ONS quarterly public sector employment survey continues to provide an official headline measure for comparing the overall size of employment in central government organisations with other sectors of the economy at the relevant quarterly reference point.

  4. Given the wide range of organisations covered, caution should be exercised when drawing inferences from the figures and care should be taken when making comparisons between organisations. Users of this management information should refer to any additional commentary and notes where these are provided.

Detailed guide: Good law

$
0
0

Updated: Added link to the Big Data for Law project.

The good law initiative is an appeal to everyone interested in the making and publishing of law to come together with a shared objective of making legislation work well for the users of today and tomorrow.

TEDx Houses of Parliament speech by Richard Heaton

Good Law: Richard Heaton at TEDxHousesofParliament

Good law: the challenge

People find legislation difficult. The volume of statutes and regulations, their piecemeal structure, and their level of detail and frequent amendments, make legislation hard to understand and difficult to comply with. That can hinder economic activity. It can create burdens for businesses and communities. It can obstruct good government, and it can undermine the rule of law.

This is not a new problem, and many things have been done to address particular aspects of it. More people now get involved in the legislative process, through the publication of draft Bills; this is good for democracy and also improves the quality of legislation. Parliamentary Counsel use a plain English style for writing laws, and are keen to try new drafting techniques rather than simply follow precedents. The Law Commission produces special bills for law reform, consolidation and repeals. The Red Tape Challenge is tackling the stock of unnecessary or unduly burdensome regulations. And The National Archives have vastly improved user access through legislation.gov.uk.

But this last development also brings into sharp focus the continuing difficulty with legislation. Law has a wider readership than ever before. The web has made it possible for people to find sources of law more easily. Once there, they tend to find the experience confusing. Reading legislation is not intuitive. One part of a statute often needs to be read alongside another; the last dated version is not the complete story; regulations have to be read alongside Acts of Parliament, and sometimes case law as well.

The digital age brings new opportunities as well: tools for publishing and arranging law, and techniques for diagnosing and predicting how law is used. So this is an exciting time for re-thinking how legislation can be made easier for users.

The #goodlaw launch: making legislation more effective and accessible

Good law: the vision

The Office of the Parliamentary Counsel (OPC) would like the user to experience good law - law that is:

  • necessary
  • clear
  • coherent
  • effective
  • accessible

We are asking a range of partners – in government, in Parliament and beyond – to help us get there. For some this may mean challenging their current approach to preparing, making, scrutinising, or publishing legislation. It may mean working more closely together with partners, or knowing better how the user finds legislation, or what they do with it. We want to build a shared accountability for (and pride in) the quality of our law, and to create confidence among users that legislation is for them.

Complexity

The Office of the Parliamentary Counsel has conducted a review into the causes of complexity. It concluded that there are many causes of complexity in legislation. Some of them are unavoidable in a complicated world in which law is used to balance competing interests. Good law is not a plea for unachievable simplicity.

But the review also observed that there is no compelling incentive within government or Parliament to avoid generating further complexity. As in any complex and inter-dependent system, any change to the overall body of law will cause an exponential increase to its overall complexity. Good law requires us to ask how we can either reverse or manage this growth in complexity.

Content, language, architecture and publication

Good law is not a checklist, or a call for more process. It straddles 4 areas that have traditionally been regarded as separate domains. We think that they are inter-connected, and we invite good law partners to consider each of them from the different perspectives of citizens, professional users and legislators.

Diagram with 'Good law' in the centre and how it interacts with the following questions: How much detail?  Is this law necessary?  Does it duplicate, or conflict with, another law? Do we know what the likely readership is? Is the language easy to understa
Good law from the perspectives of citizens, professional users and legislators

Content

How much detail? Is this law necessary? Does it duplicate, or conflict with, another law?

Language and style

Do we know what the likely readership is? Is the language easy to understand?

Architecture of the statute book

What should determine the hierarchy and structure of statute law? What should go into Acts and Regulations?

Publication

How will law appear to the online user? What can be done to improve navigation? Should we draft law to be machine-readable?

What is the OPC doing to produce good law?

Parliamentary Counsel are taking practical steps to promote good law, and are encouraging others to do the same.

  • We think greater openness about how laws are drafted and debated can help to avoid unnecessary confusion and litigation. So we are sharing our views on statutory interpretation with lawyers, the judiciary and legal educators, and we are publishing more of our previously internal guidance.
  • We are working with government policy teams about alternatives to legislation. We are encouraging everyone involved in the legislative process to challenge and be challenged on the level of detail they are proposing to legislate for, and on the case for legislating in the first place.
  • We are looking at the explanatory material published with Bills and Acts, to see what improvements might be made.
  • We are working with the online publishers of legislation to know what drafting techniques make the user’s experience better. And we are listening to users themselves, through a project run by The National Archives.

These are some examples of the work we are carrying out, alongside our core task of writing laws that are effective and can be readily understood. But we also want to generate a wider debate about the good law principles, as listed above in Good law: the vision. Are they the right ones? How can they be applied and what can we learn from elsewhere?

Relationship with other initiatives

Good law sits naturally alongside:

Good law champions

The Office of the Parliamentary Counsel is creating a network of good law champions, who share our vision and want to work with us to take this initiative forward within their departments. To get involved or to contact the good law champion in your department please email goodlaw@cabinet-office.gsi.gov.uk.

Get involved

To subscribe to the good law newsletter, find out more about our approach or to contribute views on the good law principles and how they might be achieved, email goodlaw@cabinet-office.gsi.gov.uk.

You can also follow @RHCabinetOffice or #goodlaw on Twitter.

Speech: The importance of Scotland to the UK: David Cameron’s speech

$
0
0

Updated: Draft version replaced by transcript.

I want to thank Glasgow Caledonian for co-hosting this event.

This is a fantastic, forward-looking university, and we are very grateful for your support today, as we are to the Lee Valley Velo Park for hosting us in this magnificent space.

Less than two years ago, this velodrome was a cauldron of excitement. Chris Hoy was ripping round at 40 miles per hour. I was up there. I had a whole seat but believe me I only used the edge of it. Three more golds – an incredible night. But for me, the best thing about the Olympics wasn’t the winning; it was the red, the white, the blue. It was the summer that patriotism came out of the shadows and came into the sun. Everyone cheering as one for Team GB. And it’s Team GB I want to talk about today. Our United Kingdom.

Last year, the date for the Scottish referendum was fixed. The countdown was set. And today we have just over seven months until that vote. Centuries of history hang in the balance. A question mark hangs over the future of our United Kingdom. If people vote yes in September, then Scotland will become an independent country. There will be no going back. And as I have made clear, this is a decision that is squarely and solely for those in Scotland to make.

Now, I believe passionately that it is in their interests to stay in the United Kingdom. That way Scotland has the space to take decisions, while still having the security that comes with being part of something bigger. From Holyrood they can decide what happens in every hospital, every school, every police station in Scotland. And in the United Kingdom, Scotland is part of a major global player. Now those are the arguments that we will keep on putting until 18th September, but it is their choice, their vote.

But my argument today is that, while only 4 million people can vote in this referendum, all 63 million of us are profoundly affected. There are 63 million of us who could wake up on 19th September in a different country, with a different future ahead of it. That’s why this speech is addressed not so much to the people of Scotland but to the people of England, Wales and Northern Ireland. Within these countries, there are a whole range of different views about this referendum.

There are those I’d call the ‘quiet patriots’ – people who love the United Kingdom, love our flag and our history, but think there’s nothing much that they can do to encourage Scotland to stay in the UK, so they stay out of the debate.

Then there are the ‘shoulder shruggers’ – people who are ambivalent about the outcome, who think this doesn’t matter much to anyone south of the border. Their view is that, if Scotland left the UK, then yes, that would be sad, but we could just wave them a wistful goodbye and carry on as normal.

And then there are those – only a few – who think we’d be better off if Scotland did leave the UK; that this marriage of nations has run its course and it needs a divorce.

Now, today I want to take on all these views: the idea we’d be better off without Scotland; the idea that this makes no difference to the rest of the UK; and the idea that, however much we might care, we in England, Wales and Northern Ireland can have no voice in this debate because we don’t have a vote. All of the above are wrong.

We would be deeply diminished without Scotland. This matters to all of our futures, and everyone in the UK can have a voice in this debate. I want to make this case by putting forward what, to me, are the four compelling reasons why the United Kingdom is stronger with Scotland within it.

The first is our connections with each other. Over three centuries we have lived together, worked together and frankly we’ve got together: getting married, having children, moving back and forward across our borders. Such is the fusion of our bloodlines that my surname goes back to the West Highlands and, by the way, I am as proud of my Scottish heritage as I am of my English or my Welsh heritage.

The name Cameron might mean ‘crooked nose’, but the clan motto is ‘let us unite’, and that is exactly what our islands and our nations have done. Today, 800,000 Scots live elsewhere in the United Kingdom, and more than 400,000 people who were born in the rest of the UK now live in Scotland. And there are millions of people who do business over the border every single day, like the farmers in Lincolnshire who grow some of the barley that’s used in Scotch whisky.

The United Kingdom is an intricate tapestry; millions of relationships woven tight over more than three centuries. That’s why for millions of people there is no contradiction in being proud of your Scottishness, your Englishness, your Britishness – sometimes all at once. Now some say that none of this would change with independence, that these connections would stay as strong as ever. But the fact is all these connections, whether it’s business or personal, they are eased and strengthened by the institutional framework of the United Kingdom.

When the Acts of Union were passed, the role of the state was limited to things like defence, taxes and property rights. Since then the state has transformed beyond recognition and our institutions – they have grown together like the roots of great trees, fusing together under the foundations of our daily lives.

You don’t need a customs check when you travel over the border; you don’t have to get out your passport out at Carlisle; you don’t have to deal with totally different tax systems and regulations when you trade; you don’t have to trade in different currencies.

Our human connections – our friendships, relationships, business partnerships – they are underpinned because we are all in the same United Kingdom, and that is number one reason why we are stronger together.

The second is our prosperity. Some people look at the United Kingdom only in terms of debit and credit columns, tax and spend, and how that gets split between our four nations. But that completely misses the bigger picture. This is a world that has been through massive economic storms, where economic competition is heating up as never before, where we have to work harder than ever just to make a living.

And in that world of uncertainty, we are quite simply stronger as a bigger entity. An open economy of 63 million people; we’re the oldest and most successful single market in the world, and with one of the oldest and most successful currencies in the world. That stability is hugely attractive for investors. Last year we were the top destination for foreign direct investment in Europe. That is a stamp of approval on our stability and I would not want to jeopardise that.

But let me be clear. The central part of my economic argument for the UK is not about what we’d lose if we pulled apart, but about what we could gain in this world if we stay together. This government has set out a long-term economic plan for Britain: getting behind enterprise, dealing with our debts, a plan to give the people of this country peace of mind and security for the future.

And it’s not just a plan; it is a vision. The United Kingdom as the big European success story of this century – moving from an island sinking under too much debt, too much borrowing, too much taxation to a country that is dynamic, exporting, innovating, creating. And Scotland is right at the heart of that vision. Why? Well, I could give you the list of the Scottish strengths, the historic universities like Edinburgh, Aberdeen, Glasgow and St Andrews; the great industries, from food processing to financial services, from ship-building to science. But it’s not about Scotland’s strengths as some sort of bolt-on extra. It’s about what we, the constituent parts of the United Kingdom, can achieve together – the power of collaboration. It is there in our past.

When the Scottish enlightenment met the industrial revolution, intellectual endeavour and commercial might combined to shape global economic ideas. And that power of collaboration is there today. Together we’re stronger at getting out there and selling our products to the world.

Take Scotch whisky. Whether I’m in India or China, there is barely a meeting abroad when I don’t bang the drum for whisky abroad. Now, of course, the First Minister fights hard for those deals too, but the clout we have as a United Kingdom gives us a much better chance of getting around the right tables, bashing down trade barriers, getting deals signed. And the result: Scotch whisky adds £135 to the UK’s balance of payments every single second.

And together we’re stronger to lead in the industries of the future. Take green energy. We have the wind and the waves of Scotland, decades of North Sea experience in Aberdeen and, with the rest of the UK, a domestic energy market of tens of millions of people to drive and support these new industries. Two years ago we set up the Green Investment Bank. Based in Edinburgh, it’s invested across the United Kingdom, helping a Scottish distillery to fit sustainable biomass boilers, financing a new energy centre at Addenbrooke’s Hospital in Cambridge. This is what happens when we collaborate.

We have come through the great recession together: our deficit down by a third; our economy growing; our exports to China doubled. And I believe we stand a much, much better chance of building a prosperous future together.

Now, the third reason we’re stronger together is our place in the world. Together, we get a seat at the UN Security Council, real clout in NATO and Europe, the prestige to host events like the G8. Together we’ve got the finest armed forces on our planet. I think of the fighter pilots originally operating from RAF Lossiemouth who flew sorties over Libya; the legendary Scottish titles now part of the Royal Regiment of Scotland, like the Black Watch and the Highlanders. I think of the shipyards on the Forth and Clyde, where – alongside shipyards in the rest of the UK – they are building the Queen Elizabeth aircraft carrier, launching this year to secure the seas and to keep us safe.

Now to some all this might sound like national vanity. It’s the view that, if the UK split up and our role in the world shrank, would that really matter so much. But this is a country that earns its living through its international ties with millions of our citizens living abroad. When ships are ambushed on lawless seas, that hits our trade. When the middle class in China is set to grow by millions a year that presents huge opportunities for our jobs back home here in the UK. The world shapes us, so our place in the world – that really matters.

And make no mistake: we matter more as a United Kingdom – politically, militarily, diplomatically and culturally too. And our reach – our reach is about so much more than military might; it’s about our music, our film, our TV, our fashion. The UK is the soft power superpower. You get teenagers in Tokyo and Sydney listening to Emeli Sandé. You get people in Kazakhstan and Taiwan watching BBC exports like Sherlock; there’s a good example. Written by a Scot a hundred years ago, played by an Englishman today and created for TV by a Scotsman. The World Service, transmitting to hundreds of millions. Famously Aung San Suu Kyi has said it helped her through her long years of detention, saying, ‘Everywhere I’ve been, the BBC has been with me.’ And the BBC itself, founded by a Scotsman.

My wife, Samantha, is an ambassador for the British Fashion Council and she sees and raves about the international impact of our fashion, helped along massively by Scottish designers like Christopher Kane and Jonathan Saunders. Sometimes we can forget just how big our reputation is – that the world over the letters ‘UK’ stand for unique, brilliant, creative, eccentric, ingenious. We come as a brand – and a powerful brand. Separating Scotland out of that brand would be like separating the waters of the River Tweed and the North Sea. If we lost Scotland, if the UK changed, we would rip the rug from our own reputation. The fact is we matter more in the world if we stay together.

These are all, I believe, compelling practical reasons for the United Kingdom to stick together. But, pounds and pence, institutional questions – that’s not really what it’s about for me. It’s about the slave who escaped his master after the American Revolution because he was offered liberty and land by the British crown. In gratitude, he named himself this: British Freedom. It’s about Lord Lovat on the beach on D-Day, the bagpipes playing as his brigade landed ashore. It’s about HMS Sheffield, HMS Glasgow, HMS Antrim, HMS Glamorgan – grey ships ploughing through those grey seas for 8,000 miles to the Falkland Islands – and for what? For freedom. Because this is a country that has never been cowed by bullies and dictators. This is a country that stands for something. And this, really, is why I’m standing here today: our shared values. Freedom. Solidarity. Compassion. Not just overseas, but at home.

In this country, we don’t walk on by when people are sick, when people lose work, when people get old. I know when you talk about an Englishman, a Welshman, a Scotsman, a Northern Irishman, it might sound like the beginning of a bad joke, but it’s actually how we started our NHS, our welfare system, our state pension system. And these values, they’re not trapped in the pages of a history book – they’re live. When the people of Benghazi were crying out for help, when a girl in Pakistan was shot for wanting an education, when children around the world are desperate for food or for aid, we don’t walk on by.

And let’s be clear. Our values are not just a source of pride for us; they are a source of hope for the world. In 1964, Nelson Mandela stood in the dock in the Pretoria Supreme Court. He was making the case for his life, against apartheid, and in that speech he invoked the example of Britain. He said, ‘I have great respect for British political institutions, and for the country’s system of justice.’ He said, ‘I regard the British Parliament as the most democratic institution in the world.’ Our Parliament, our laws, our way of life – so often, down the centuries, the UK has given people hope. We’ve shown that democracy and prosperity can go hand in hand; that resolution is found not through the bullet, but the ballot box. Our values are of value to the world. In the darkest times in human history there has been, in the North Sea, a light that never goes out. And if this family of nations broke up, something very powerful and very precious the world over would go out forever.

So there is a moral, economic, geopolitical, diplomatic and yes – let’s say it proudly – emotional case for keeping the United Kingdom together. But still, however strongly we feel, we can be a reticent nation. It can seem vulgar to fly the flag. Some people have advised me to stay out of this issue, and don’t get too sentimental about the UK. But frankly, I care too much to stay out of it. This is personal.

I have an old copy of Our Island Story, my favourite book as a child, and I want to give it to my three children, and I want to be able to teach my youngest, when she’s old enough to understand, that she is part of this great, world‑beating story. And I passionately hope that my children will be able to teach their children the same; that the stamp on their passport is a mark of pride; that together these islands really do stand for something more than the sum of our parts; they stand for bigger ideals, nobler causes, greater values. Our brilliant United Kingdom: brave, brilliant, buccaneering, generous, tolerant, proud – this is our country. And we built it together, brick by brick: Scotland, England, Wales, Northern Ireland. Brick by brick. This is our home, and I could not bear to see it torn apart.

I love this country. I love the United Kingdom and all it stands for, and I will fight with everything I have to keep us together. And so I want to be clear to everyone listening: there can be no complacency about the result of this referendum. The outcome is still up in the air and we have just seven months to go: seven months to do all we can to keep our United Kingdom as one; seven months to save the most extraordinary country in history. And we must do whatever it takes.

So to everyone in England, Wales and Northern Ireland, everyone like me, who cares about the United Kingdom, I want to say this: you don’t have a vote, but you do have a voice. Those voting, they’re our friends, they’re our neighbours, they’re our family. You do have an influence. So, get on the phone, get together, email, tweet, speak; let the message ring out from Manchester to Motherwell, from Pembrokeshire to Perth, from Belfast to Bute, from us to the people of Scotland. Let the message be this: we want you to stay. Think of what we’ve done together, what we can do together, what we stand for together.

Team GB. The winning team in world history. Let us stick together for a winning future too. Thank you.

Press release: Resignation of Mark Harper MP

$
0
0

Mark Harper offered his resignation after he was informed that his cleaner did not have indefinite leave to remain in the United Kingdom, despite having shown him documents claiming she did.

He immediately notified the Prime Minister - who accepted his resignation with regret.

There is no suggestion that Mr Harper knowingly employed an illegal immigrant.

The exchange of letters between the Mark Harper and the Prime Minister is copied below.

Letter from Mark Harper to the Prime Minister:

7 February 2014

Dear Prime Minister

In April 2007 I took on a cleaner for my London flat. In doing so, I was very mindful of my legal and financial obligations and undertook a number of checks beforehand. This included consideration of the HMRC tests as to whether the cleaner was performing her work under a contract for services on a self-employed basis which I concluded she was. However, even though there was no legal requirement for me to check her right to work in the UK, I felt that it was appropriate to do so. I therefore took a copy of her passport to verify her identity and also a copy of a Home Office letter, dated 26 January 2006, which stated that she had leave to remain indefinitely in the United Kingdom, including the right to work and engage in a business.

I considered the issue again when you appointed me as a Minister in the Cabinet Office in May 2010 and concluded that as I had performed a right to work check in 2007 and that my cleaner had indefinite leave to remain in the UK no further check was necessary. When you then appointed me as Immigration Minister in September 2012 I went through a similar consideration process and once again concluded that no further check was necessary. In retrospect, I should have checked more thoroughly.

As I took the Immigration Bill through Parliament in autumn 2013 I talked a lot about these matters in the context both of employers and landlords. What we do, and will, require of both is that they carry out reasonable checks and take copies of documents. We do not require them to be experts or spot anything other than an obvious forgery. Given this focus on these matters, I thought it prudent to check that all my documents were in order for my cleaner. I undertook an extensive search to locate the copies of documents I had taken but unfortunately I was unable to locate them.

As a result, in the week commencing 20 January 2014 I asked my cleaner for further copies of these documents which she provided on 4 February. On 5 February, I asked my private office to check the details with immigration officials to confirm that all was in order. I was informed on the morning of 6 February that my cleaner did not in fact have indefinite leave to remain in the United Kingdom. I immediately notified the Home Secretary and my Permanent Secretary. This is now a matter for Immigration Enforcement.

Although I complied with the law at all times, I consider that as Immigration Minister, who is taking legislation through Parliament which will toughen up our immigration laws, I should hold myself to a higher standard than expected of others. I have also considered the impact on my Parliamentary colleagues, the Government and you. I have always believed that politics is a team game, not an individual sport. Under the circumstances, I have therefore decided that the right course is for me to return to the Backbenches. I am sorry for any embarrassment caused.

I am grateful for the opportunities you have given me since you became Leader of the Conservative Party, first in Opposition and then in Government. I will continue to support you as Prime Minister, the Conservative Party and this Government in whatever way I can from the backbenches. I will also continue to serve my constituents in the Forest of Dean to the best of my ability.

Yours ever,

Mark

Mark Harper MP

Letter from the Prime Minister to Mark Harper

7 February 2014

Thank you for your letter earlier this evening.

I am very sorry indeed to see you leave the Government, but I understand your reasons for doing so.

In particular, I understand your view that, although you carried out checks on your cleaner, you feel that you should hold yourself to an especially high standard as Immigration Minister. You have taken an honourable decision.

You have been a highly effective Minister in the Government – both most recently as Immigration Minister, overseeing the passage of the Immigration Bill with great skill and dedication, and before that as a Minister in the Cabinet Office. You can be very proud of what you have achieved in Government – and before that in Opposition.

I have always enormously appreciated your energy and your loyalty. It is typical of you that you should be so mindful of the wider interests of the Government and the Party in reaching the decision that you have, and I am very grateful for that.

You will be greatly missed, and I hope very much that you will be able to return to service on the Frontbench before too long.

With all good wishes.

Yours, David

David Cameron MP

Prime Minister

News story: Details of ministerial appointments announced

$
0
0
  • James Brokenshire MP to become a Minister of State at the Home Office.
  • Karen Bradley MP to become a Parliamentary Under Secretary of State at the Home Office.
  • John Penrose MP to become a Government Whip (Junior Lord of the Treasury), House of Commons.
  • Harriett Baldwin MP to become an Assistant Whip, House of Commons.

Notes for Editors:

  • James Brokenshire MP was previously a Parliamentary Under Secretary of State at the Home Office.
  • Karen Bradley MP was previously a Government Whip (Junior Lord of the Treasury), House of Commons.
  • John Penrose MP was previously an Assistant Whip, House of Commons.
  • Harriett Baldwin MP enters the government.

Research and analysis: Social impact bonds: unit cost data

$
0
0

Unit cost data that brings together more than 600 unit cost estimates in 1 place, covering 5 categories:

  • education and skills
  • employment
  • health
  • crime and housing
  • social services

The costs can be used by local commissioners, charitable organisations and social enterprises to inform:

  • social impact bond proposals for new interventions or the redesign of existing public services
  • feasibility studies and evaluations

Most of the unit cost estimates are based on national research and so may not correspond exactly to local costs. In order to develop locally specific data, users may want to undertake research into costs in their area, or apply an appropriate discount to account for regional variations.

Collection: Good law

Detailed guide: Transposing EU procurement directives

$
0
0

Updated: Updated public sector training session dates.

The European Parliament adopted the 2014 EU Procurement Directives on Wednesday 15 January 2014. These directives are due to come into force in March 2014 and EU member states will have 2 years to implement them in national legislation.

The government is aiming to transpose (implement) these directives quickly so that the UK can benefit as soon as possible from the improved flexibilities they offer. Here we will keep you up to date on progress in Brussels, UK transposition of the directives and where to access free training.

Progress in Brussels

The European Parliament voted to approve the 2014 Directives on 15 January 2014. The next stage is for Council to formally adopt them and confirm their entry into force in March 2014. The directives also affect concessions (partnerships between the public sector and mostly private companies that maintain infrastructure or provide important services) and utilities (water, energy, transport and postal services).

Implementing the directives

Where the directives allow member states a choice on whether or how to implement a particular provision, Cabinet Office have issued discussion papers and will consider responses. For more information please see Procurement Policy Note 05/13. We will launch a formal consultation on the draft implementing regulations in due course.

Training

Cabinet Office is developing a free package of supporting materials with guidance on the new regulations. This includes working with sector leads to coordinate a series of 1-day training sessions for public sector organisations. We are pleased to announce the first training dates for below with details of how to register. We will be releasing further dates in due course. E-learning resources and handbooks will also be available here later in 2014.

Book a training session

Please complete the respective application form for your chosen date and send this to EURegistration@cabinet-office.gsi.gov.uk with the venue name and date in the subject line.

Public sector training

Public sector: application form for EU Directives training

This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.Request a different format.

If you use assistive technology and need a version of this document in a more accessible format please emailpubliccorrespondence@cabinet-office.gsi.gov.uk quoting your address, telephone number along with the title of the publication ("Public sector: application form for EU Directives training").

Voluntary sector training

Training sessions are being organised specifically for contracting authorities in the voluntary sector. We will confirm dates shortly.

Utilities

Training sessions for contracting entities under the Utilities Directive will take place on:

  • 22 July 2014
  • 25 July 2014

All sessions take place at Severn Trent Water Limited, Severn Trent Centre, 2 St Johns Street, Coventry, CV1 2LZ

Utilities: application form for EU Directives training

This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.Request a different format.

If you use assistive technology and need a version of this document in a more accessible format please emailpubliccorrespondence@cabinet-office.gsi.gov.uk quoting your address, telephone number along with the title of the publication ("Utilities: application form for EU Directives training").

Northern Ireland public sector

Training sessions have been organised for contracting authorities in Northern Ireland

  • 11 June 2014
  • 12 June 2014

All sessions take place in Belfast. The venue will be confirmed.

Public sector: application form for EU Directives training

This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.Request a different format.

If you use assistive technology and need a version of this document in a more accessible format please emailpubliccorrespondence@cabinet-office.gsi.gov.uk quoting your address, telephone number along with the title of the publication ("Public sector: application form for EU Directives training").

Wales public sector

Value Wales will coordinate training sessions for Wales professionals and further information will be available shortly.

About the training

Please note that places on these sessions will be limited and we would generally expect only 1 delegate per organisation: that delegate can then use the materials to brief their colleagues. If you need more than 1 place please let us know and we will do our best to accommodate you. Because of the limited number of places, failure to attend a booked course may result in you not being offered an alternative date.

Delegates need to make own arrangements for lunch and refreshments as these are not provided: please check with the venue for available facilities.

Press release: Cross-government copyright deal to save money as part of long-term economic plan

$
0
0

The Cabinet Office has signed an innovative 3 year copyright licensing deal in a move that will transform copyright licensing arrangements for central government and save money for taxpayers.

The new licence agreement with the Copyright Licensing Agency (CLA) allows reproduction of digital or print material in magazines, journals and books, enabling civil servants to re-use copyright material when needed in their work. The deal does away with the multiple licences and different tariffs held by departments, with a single licence now covering over 90 departments and agencies.

This single annual transaction will remain in place until March 2016 and will reduce administrative burdens for government and create a level playing field across departments, delivering savings of £1.1 million a year for hard-working taxpayers.

Minister for Cabinet Office Francis Maude said:

As part of our long-term economic plan, this government is tackling wasteful spend across Whitehall. Last year alone we saved taxpayers £3.8 billion but hard-working people expect us to do more. This deal, which will save £1 million a year, shows how we can leverage our buying power by acting as a single customer.

Minister for Intellectual Property, Lord Younger said:

I welcome this new pan-governmental licence. It not only represents good value for money for the government and the taxpayer, but also it ensures that rights holders are properly remunerated for the use of their work.

The licence demonstrates that government continues to be committed to supporting the creative economy by reimbursing rights holders fairly for the use of their work.

The move is in line with the government’s recommendations in the Hargreaves Review to simplify the licensing process for copyright users in the digital age and joins other single sector licences which exist for NHS England and for English schools.

Detailed guide: Honours committees

$
0
0

Updated: Added information on available positions - Chair of Economy Honours Committee and Chair of Science and Technology Honours Committee.

Honours committees are made up of senior civil servants (‘official members’) and people who are independent of government (‘independent members’). All honours committees have a majority of members who are independent.

Each honours committee has an independent chairperson. A representative from 10 Downing Street is invited to attend all committee meetings.

Honours committees review honours nominations for people involved in specific activities (like arts and media or sport) which are then sent to the main honours committee.

Main committee

Members are:

  • Head of the Home Civil Service (chair)
  • Chair of Arts and Media Committee: Sir Vernon Ellis
  • Chair of Community, Voluntary and Local Services Committee: Dame Clare Tickell DBE
  • Chair of the Economy Committee: Sir John Parker GBE
  • Chair of Education Committee: Sir Michael Barber
  • Chair of Health Committee: Professor The Lord Kakkar
  • Chair of Parliamentary and Political Service Committee: The Rt. Hon. The Lord Spicer
  • Chair of Science and Technology Committee: The Lord Krebs FRS
  • Chair of Sport Committee: The Lord Coe of Ranmore KBECH
  • Chair of State Committee: Dame Mary Marsh DBE
  • The Cabinet Secretary
  • The Permanent Secretary of the Foreign and Commonwealth Office
  • The Chief of Defence Staff
  • Another Permanent Secretary (currently Sir Paul Jenkins KCB QC, the Treasury Solicitor)

Arts and media

Sir Vernon Ellis - Chair, British Council (independent chair)

Independent members:

  • The Lord Fellowes of West Stafford DL - writer, actor and director
  • Dame Liz Forgan DBE - journalist
  • Julia Peyton Jones OBE– Director, the Serpentine Gallery
  • Luke Rittner - Chief Executive, Royal Academy of Dance
  • Sir Peter Stothard - Editor, The Times Literary Supplement

Official members:

  • Sue Owen CB - Permanent Secretary, Department for Culture, Media and Sport
  • Sir Peter Housden KCB - Permanent Secretary, Scottish Government

Community, voluntary and local services

Dame Clare Tickell DBE - Chief Executive, Hanover Housing Association (independent chair)

Independent members:

  • Evelyn Asante-Mensah OBEDL - Chair, NHS Manchester
  • Melanie Bryan OBE– social entrepreneur, Why Not Change?
  • Sue Charteris - former Director of Shared Intelligence; member of the England Committee, Big Lottery Fund and former Chief Executive of Merton
  • Dilwar Hussain – Co-founder, New Horizons in British Islam
  • Dr. Angus Kennedy OBE - Chief Executive, Community Regeneration Partnership
  • John Knight CBE JP - formerly Director of Policy at Leonard Cheshire Disability and Board Member, Charity Commission
  • Dame Barbara Monroe DBE– Chief Executive, St. Christopher’s Hospice
  • Brian O’Doherty – lately Head of Housing, Newcastle City Council
  • Noreen Oliver MBE – Founder and Chief Executive Officer, BAC O’Connor Centre
  • The Lord Shipley - Leader, Newcastle City Council
  • Sir Nicholas Young - Chief Executive, British Red Cross

Official members:

  • Dame Ursula Brennan DCB - Permanent Secretary, Ministry of Justice
  • Helen Edwards - Director General for Localism, Department for Communities and Local Government
  • Sir Derek Jones KCB - Permanent Secretary, Welsh Government
  • Mark Sedwill CMG - Permanent Secretary, Home Office
  • Chris Wormald - Permanent Secretary, Department for Education

The economy

Sir John Parker GBE (independent chair) - Chair, Anglo American plc

Independent members:

  • Dame Helen Alexander DBE– Chair, UBM plc and Chancellor, University of Southampton
  • Dame Colette Bowe DBE - Chair, Office of Communications (Ofcom)
  • Sherry Coutu CBE– angel investor
  • The Rt Hon Baroness Dean of Thornton-le-Fylde - Member, House of Lords Appointment Commission
  • Anya Hindmarch MBE – fashion designer and businesswoman
  • Sir Richard Lambert - former Director General, CBI
  • Helen Mahy - Group Company Secretary and General Counsel, National Grid
  • Dr Yvonne Thompson CBE - entrepreneur

Official members:

  • Martin Donnelly CMG - Permanent Secretary, Department for Business, Innovation and Skills
  • Sue Owen CB - Permanent Secretary, Department for Culture, Media and Sport
  • Sir Nicholas MacPherson KCB - Permanent Secretary, HM Treasury
  • Sir Peter Housden KCB - Permanent Secretary, Scottish Government

Education

Professor Sir Michael Barber - Head, McKinsey’s Global Education Practice (independent chair)

Independent members:

  • Graham Badman CBE - former Managing Director,Children, Schools and Education Directorate, Kent County Council
  • Dame Rachel de Souza DBE - Chief Executive Officer, Inspiration Trust
  • Professor Sir Deian Hopkin - former Vice Chancellor and Chief Executive, London South Bank University
  • Marion Matchett CBE - Civil Service Commissioner for Northern Ireland
  • Sir Daniel Moynihan - Chief Executive, Harris Federation
  • Peter Williams CBE - former Chief Executive, Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education

Official members:

  • Martin Donnelly CMG - Permanent Secretary, Department for Business, Innovation and Skills
  • Chris Wormald - Permanent Secretary, Department for Education
  • Dr. Malcolm McKibbin - Head, Northern Ireland Civil Service

Health

Professor The Lord Kakkar - Director, Thrombosis Research Institute (independent chair)

Independent members:

  • Dame Christine Beasley DBE– Chief Nursing Officer for England
  • Sir Leszek Borysiewicz FRS - Vice-Chancellor, University of Cambridge
  • Dame Ruth Carnall DBE - Chief Executive, NHS London
  • Professor Sir Ian Gilmore - Chair, Liverpool Health Partners, University of Liverpool
  • Dame Janet Husband DBE - former Chair, Royal College of Radiologists Council
  • Sir Nicholas Partridge OBE - Chief Executive, Terrence Higgins Trust
  • Professor Sir Simon Wessely – Director, King’s Centre for Military Health Research, King’s College London

Official members:

  • Dame Sally Davies DBE - Chief Medical Officer (England)
  • Una O’Brien CB - Permanent Secretary, Department of Health
  • David Sissling - Director General, Department for Health, Social Services and Children, Welsh Government

Parliamentary and political service

The Rt. Hon. The Lord Spicer - Member, House of Lords (independent chair)

Independent members:

  • Dianne Bevan – Chief Operating Officer, National Assembly for Wales
  • The Rt Hon the Lord Butler of Brockwell KG GCB CVO - Member, House of Lords
  • The Rt Hon the Baroness Hayman GBE – former Speaker of the House of Lords
  • Dame Mary Keegan DBE– Non-Executive Board Member, National Audit Office and Governor, Falmouth University
  • The Rt Hon Peter Riddell CBE– Director, Institute for Government

Official members:

  • The Rt Hon Don Foster MP - Liberal Democrat Chief Whip
  • The Rt Hon Sir George Young Bt CH MP - Parliamentary Secretary to the Treasury and Chief Whip
  • The Rt Hon Rosie Winterton MP - Labour Chief Whip

Science and technology

The Lord Krebs FRS - Principal, Jesus College, Oxford (independent chair)

Independent members:

  • Professor Sir Tony Atkinson FBA - Senior Research Fellow, Nuffield College
  • Professor Dame Janet Finch DBEDL - former Vice Chancellor, Keele University
  • Professor Dame Julia King DBE - Vice-Chancellor, Aston University
  • Martyn Rose – Director, Martyn Rose Ltd.
  • Professor Dame Nancy Rothwell DBEFRSDL - President and Vice Chancellor, University of Manchester

Official members:

  • Professor Sir Mark Walport FRS - Chief Scientific Adviser to HM Government
  • Professor Sir John O’Reilly FREng– Director-General, Knowledge and Innovation, Department for Business, Innovation and Skills

Sport

The Lord Coe of Ranmore KBECH– Chairman, CSM (independent chair)

Independent members:

  • Giles Clarke – Chair, England and Wales Cricket Board and Director, International Cricket Council
  • The Baroness Grey Thompson of Eaglescliffe DBE - former Paralympic athlete
  • Tim Lamb - Chief Executive, Sport and Reaction Alliance
  • Tim Phillips - former Chairman, All England Lawn Tennis Club
  • Graham Taylor OBE - former England Football Manager

Official members:

  • Sue Owens CB - Permanent Secretary, Department for Culture, Media and Sport
  • Dr. Malcolm McKibbin - Head, Northern Ireland Civil Service

State

Dame Mary Marsh DBE - Director, Clore Social Leadership Programme (independent chair)

Independent members:

  • The Rt Hon the Baroness Bottomley of Nettlestone JP DL– Member, House of Lords and Chair, Board Practice, Odgers Berndtson
  • Dame Suzi Leather DBEDL - former Chair, Charity Commission
  • Elizabeth McKeikan - Non-Executive Director, JD Wetherspoon plc. and former Civil Service Commissioner
  • Dr. Diana Walford CBE - former Principal, Mansfield College, Oxford
  • Dr. Suzy Walton – Deputy Chairman RSA, University of Westminster and Internet Watch Foundation

Official members:

  • Sir Paul Jenkins KCB QC - Chief Executive and Permanent Secretary, Treasury Solicitor’s Department
  • Sir Bob Kerslake - Head of the Civil Service

Available committee membership positions

Honours applications are reviewed by the Main Honours Advisory Committee and 8 specialist sub-committees. From time to time, the Cabinet Office invites applications to fill vacancies on the committees.

There are currently 2 vacancies: 1 for Chair of Economy Honours Committee and the other for Chair of Science and Technology Honours Committee. These adverts have also gone live on the Public Appointments website, together with application forms in Word format.

The closing date for both applications is 31 March 2014.

Economy Chair application form

This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.Request a different format.

If you use assistive technology and need a version of this document in a more accessible format please emailpubliccorrespondence@cabinet-office.gsi.gov.uk quoting your address, telephone number along with the title of the publication ("Economy Chair application form").

Science and Technology Chair application form

This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.Request a different format.

If you use assistive technology and need a version of this document in a more accessible format please emailpubliccorrespondence@cabinet-office.gsi.gov.uk quoting your address, telephone number along with the title of the publication ("Science and Technology Chair application form ").

Honours Committees posts: further particulars

This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.Request a different format.

If you use assistive technology and need a version of this document in a more accessible format please emailpubliccorrespondence@cabinet-office.gsi.gov.uk quoting your address, telephone number along with the title of the publication ("Honours Committees posts: further particulars").

Collection: Honours: lists, reform and operation

$
0
0

Updated: Added link to available honours committee positions.

This series brings together recent honours lists, reports on the reform and operation of the honours system, case study leaflets of some of the people who have received honours and details of how to make a nomination.

There are currently 2 vacancies for positions on honours committees - find out more and how to apply.

Find out more about the honours system.

Collection: Triennial review reports

$
0
0

Updated: Triennial Review of the Veterinary Products Committee added to collection.

In April 2011, Cabinet Office announced that all non-departmental public bodies (NDPBs) still in existence following the reforms brought about by the Public Bodies Act would have to undergo a substantive review at least once every 3 years, starting in 2011 to 2012.

These triennial reviews would have 2 purposes:

  • to provide a strong challenge of the continuing need for individual NDPBs, both their function and their form, employing the ‘3 tests’ discipline
  • where it is agreed that a particular body should remain as an NDPB, to review the control and governance arrangements in place to ensure that the public body is complying with recognised principles of good corporate governance

Guidance on how these reviews should be undertaken was published by Cabinet Office in June 2011.

One of the founding principles of the reviews is transparency. The guidance stipulates that the review itself should be open and transparent, and that a report must be published at the end of the review that details the evidence and rationale for decisions about the body’s future. Departments publish these reports online and announce their publication to Parliament.

Guidance on the triennial review process is part of the wider governance of public bodies.

Triennial reports hosted on external websites


Corporate report: The Cabinet Committees system and list of Cabinet Committees

$
0
0

Updated: Updated list of Cabinet Committees and their members.

Cabinet and Cabinet Committees are groups of ministers that can take collective decisions that are binding across government. The Cabinet is the supreme decision-making body in government, dealing with the big issues of the day and the government’s overall strategy. Cabinet Committees reduce the burden on Cabinet by enabling collective decisions to be taken by a smaller group of ministers. The composition and terms of reference of Coalition Cabinet Committees are a matter for the Prime Minister, in consultation with the Deputy Prime Minister.

Speech: David Cameron’s statement on the UK storms and flooding

$
0
0

Statement on UK Storms and Flooding

Thank you. Good afternoon and welcome. Britain is facing one of its wettest winters in 2 and a half centuries and some of the worst flooding in decades. In the past week, more than 800 properties have been affected.

As we stand right now, there are still currently 16 severe flood warnings, meaning there is danger to life; 133 flood warnings, which means that more flooding is expected and that immediate action is required; and a further 225 flood alerts.

There is absolutely no sign of this threat abating and with further rain and strong winds forecast throughout the week, things may well get worse before they get better.

I’ve just got back from visiting some of the worst-affected areas in the South West and in the Thames Valley. I’ve seen our hardworking emergency services and Environment Agency staff working around the clock to help families and communities. Some of these staff have been on an emergency footing since the East Coast tidal surge in early December, the effects of which I saw for myself when I visited Norfolk before Christmas.

And on behalf of the whole country, I want to thank our emergency services, all the Environment Agency staff, all the local authority workers and the many volunteers for what they’re doing in these most difficult and relentless circumstances.

We’ve taken action across the board; when pumps were needed on the Somerset Levels, we sent pumps from the strategic reserve. When it was clear that additional manpower was needed, we deployed the military, assisting efforts at places like Stanmore Bank in Somerset and shoring up flood defences in Dorset. When it was clear that local resources would be stretched, we changed the rules so that local authorities could claim back 100% of the flood costs from central government.

But more needs to be done, and my message to the country today is this: money is no object in this relief effort. Whatever money is needed for it will be spent. We will take whatever steps are necessary.

So let me explain what that means in the days and weeks ahead. First, I will continue to lead the national response by chairing meetings of the government’s emergency committee, COBR. I’m cancelling my visit to the Middle East next week; I’m sending my apologies today to Prime Minister Netanyahu and President Abbas. But nothing is more important than dealing with these floods.

Second, I’ve seen for myself that the gold and silver command system that we have is working well, where one individual takes charge to make sure that the police, fire brigade and other agencies like local authorities, work together as one unit. But it is clear that the military can play a further role. By the end of the day we will have deployed 1,600 servicemen and women and there are thousands more now available.

I’ve asked Major General Patrick Saunders to coordinate the military effort. They will be working with our gold and silver commands to provide assistance and assurance to members of the public including by reinforcing sandbags and flood defences, getting medical assistance to the sick and infirm, and checking on and helping any other vulnerable people.

I urge everyone in those affected areas to keep listening to the warnings and to keep working with the emergency services, the military and everyone who’s working to keep people safe.

Third, let me turn to fixing some of the specifics. In the South West, people are understandably very concerned about their transport connections. Network Rail is working 18 hours a day to fix the train line at Dawlish. We announced earlier this week, support including financial support for more flights from Newquay to Gatwick and we’re discussing with the train operators how to make sure that we get a replacement bus service as good as possible over the days ahead.

On the Somerset Levels, there have been more than 65 million cubic metres of floodwater. There is now around 3 million tonnes of water being pumped out every day; that’s the equivalent of 3 Wembley stadiums. And this capacity will be increased further by the new pumping strategy that I was hearing about today in Somerset that’s now being put in place. But again, like the train line at Dawlish, this is going to take time to fix. It’ll take time to get those levels down.

Clearly the most serious developing situation is in the Thames Valley. Military deployment began with a building of a 60 metre wall at Datchet and today we’ve deployed a hundred-strong company of the 1st Battalion Royal Regiment of Fusiliers on the ground in Wraysbury in a community support role. We’ll be discussing at COBR tonight what further steps we can take to help those affected communities.

Fourth, as the floodwaters recede, we will need to help people and businesses recover from this very difficult time. I’m setting up a new cabinet committee to oversee the recovery, and I’ll be chairing the first meeting on Thursday. We’ll be focussing on getting the insurance companies out there, so people can make their claims quickly, and the Association of British Insurers, the ABI, together with the CBI and other business organisations are meeting here in Downing Street as I speak to help us develop further measures to support businesses in affected areas.

And in the days ahead, as homeowners, businesses, farmers, think about how to piece their lives back together again, we’ll be announcing a number of new schemes to help. For homeowners, support in the form of grants to build better flood protection as they repair their properties. For businesses, a tax deferral scheme for businesses affected by the floods, to give them longer to pay their taxes, and again grants to help them improve their flood defences. And for farmers, we will be establishing new funding that will release up to £10 million to help them recover from the devastation to their livelihoods. We’ll be setting out more detail about all of these schemes in the days to come.

As I’ve said before, there are lessons to be learnt from this experience, and those lessons will be learnt, but right now my focus is on the operational response. Helping those people who need help and protecting those properties which need protecting. It will be a long haul, and it will require a stepped-up national effort with the whole country pulling together.

One of the most inspiring things I’ve seen over the past few days has been the incredible spirit of volunteers in our communities. People I met like Sheila Mayne, who worked at the rescue centre in Dawlish serving tea to displaced families night and day during the evacuation; Storm Wallace, who organised community clear-ups of Chesil Beach through Facebook; and Jackie Breakspear and Amanda Broughton-South, the joint landladies of the Cove House Inn in Chiswell, who helped pull their community through an extraordinary storm as waves lashed against their pub.

Amidst all of this, as is so often the case, in the toughest of times we are seeing the best of Britain. It will take time, but together we will deal with these floods, we’ll get our country back on its feet and we will build a more resilient country for the future. Thank you.

Guidance: Security Classifications: sample advert and invitation to tender

$
0
0

The new Security Classification scheme comes into force on 2 April 2014 and describes how the government will classify information assets to make sure they’re appropriately protected. The scheme applies to all information that government collects, stores, processes, generates or shares to deliver services and conduct business.

Procurers should draw the forthcoming changes to bidders’ attention, as these will need to be recognised and included in the bidding process.

Guidance: Security Classifications: sample variation agreement

$
0
0

This sample contract variation agreement has been produced to help government procurers and contract managers in changing current security classifications contract provisions as the new classifications policy comes into force on 2 April 2014.

Policy paper: Response to report on the Olympic and Paralympic legacy

Viewing all 8439 articles
Browse latest View live


Latest Images

<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>